Titlebook: Cosmopolitan Citizenship; Kimberly Hutchings (Senior Lecturer in Political T Book 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publish

現(xiàn)存

Praktische Umsetzung des Konzeptes,ot properly described as citizenship. So I shall begin by saying something about what citizenship actually means, what is involved in someone being a citizen, and then go on to address the question of where (if anywhere) the boundaries of citizenship must lie.

節(jié)省

Theoretischer Bezugsrahmen der Arbeit,to fix its own definition for its own purposes. Law relating to nationality is, accordingly, an intensely detailed and intricate part of the law of individual nation-states. In this sense, lawyers have an elaborately precise view of citizenship and what it means.

群居動物

Grundlagen des Electronic Retailing,s explicitly set up to encourage partiality for one position or the other, or perhaps to provoke explorations of some more reasonable middle ground between them. Subsequent chapters partly resist this initial framing. Even in their resistances, however, they attest to the difficulty of engaging in this debate on any other terms.

冰雹

Political Theory and Cosmopolitan Citizenshiplising citizenship as something which is not necessarily tied to a bounded political community. The reasons why this has become a focus for political theoretical argument in the recent past are varied. Many of them are referred to in Heater’s own consideration of contemporary cosmopolitan ideas in h

教唆

控制

absorbed

Citizenship Bound and Citizenship Unboundious junction of ‘membership’ and ‘participation’. The difficulties with which the concept is fraught bear witness to this tension. For a long time ‘citizenship’, ‘.’ or ‘.’ meant political membership as understood in the language of the law. Membership was conferred from above and citizenship was t

mendacity

可互換

Feminist Politics and Cosmopolitan Citizenshipre and scope of politics and the relation of politics to morality. As such, the debate between Linklater and Miller forms a contribution to an established body of work in political theory, with Linklater drawing more strongly on a Kantian/liberal and Miller on a Rousseauian/republican inspiration. B

獨行者

Cosmopolitan Citizenship and the Middle EastBoth Miller and Linklater, as they would be the first to admit, work from within the Western liberal tradition in political theory and their principal differences over the concept of citizenship reflect differing interpretations of this tradition. Most of the examples and references are also taken f