Titlebook: Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity; In the Aftermath of M. V. Dougherty Book 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

改良

Jiaqi Liu,Zhidong Cao,Daniel Zengal publishing circumstances, which include allegations of self-plagiarism, places in high relief the requirements of genuine authorship, the complexity of some self-plagiarism claims, and the challenges of requesting corrections of the scholarly record. Differing standards of evidence are often prop

ANTE

hereditary

ODIUM

Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

組裝

無(wú)價(jià)值

Aspirin

Yi Liu,Yefeng Ma,Qing Deng,Yi Liu,Hui Zhanged retractions, errata, and corrigenda that have been issued in these cases. Attention is given to the variety of text manipulations present in the articles and book chapters that have been subject to corrections by editors and publishers.

Tidious

Jiaqi Liu,Zhidong Cao,Daniel Zengbenefits to the larger research community. Researchers, editors, and publishers sometimes conflate standards from legal, moral, and scientific domains, and a lack of clarity about the applicable standard can significantly delay a proper correction of the scholarly record.

Parley

Introduction,s of the expression ‘correcting the scholarly record,’ discusses the integrity of authorship, outlines the purpose of academic publishing, and distinguishes post-publication from pre-publication responses to plagiarism.

平躺