找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步，快速開始

掃一掃，訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity; In the Aftermath of M. V. Dougherty Book 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

[復制鏈接]
查看: 29191|回復: 42
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:20:59 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity
副標題In the Aftermath of
編輯M. V. Dougherty
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/239/238750/238750.mp4
概述The first book-length study on post-publication responses to academic plagiarism.Demonstrates that all members of the research community have indispensable roles for rectifying the harms of academic p
叢書名稱Research Ethics Forum
圖書封面Titlebook: Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity; In the Aftermath of M. V. Dougherty Book 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018
描述This volume is the first book-length study on post-publication responses to academic plagiarism in humanities disciplines. It demonstrates that the correction of the scholarly literature for plagiarism is not a task for editors and publishers alone; each member of the research community has an indispensable role in maintaining the integrity of the published literature in the aftermath of plagiarism. If untreated, academic plagiarism damages the integrity of the scholarly record, corrupts the surrounding academic enterprise, and creates inefficiencies across all levels of knowledge production. By providing case studies from the field of philosophy and related disciplines, the volume exhibits that current post-publication responses to academic plagiarism are insufficient. It catalogues how humanities disciplines fall short in comparison with the natural and biomedical sciences for ensuring the integrity of the body of published research. This volume provides clarity about how to conceptualize the scholarly record, surveys the traditional methods for correcting it, and argues for new interventions to improve the reliability of the body of published research. The book is valuable not o
出版日期Book 2018
關鍵詞scholarly record for research integrity; academic plagiarism; consequences of plagiarism; what is acade
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99435-2
isbn_ebook978-3-319-99435-2Series ISSN 2212-9529 Series E-ISSN 2212-9537
issn_series 2212-9529
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2018
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity被引頻次




書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity年度引用




書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity讀者反饋




書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics
 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty
 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory
 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance
 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage
您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:21:06 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:01:40 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:37:04 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:14:25 | 只看該作者
Run Yu Chen,Jin Yi Guo,Xiao Long Dengorrect the scholarly record when publications themselves are deficient. Intent may be an important element to be considered by institutions that have the role of investigating and punishing wrongdoers for scientific misconduct, but intent should be considered immaterial by members of the research co
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:23:02 | 只看該作者
Yi Liu,Yefeng Ma,Qing Deng,Yi Liu,Hui Zhangthe original source material misappropriated in the act of plagiarism, and (3) are easily accessible to the scholarly community without registration barriers or paywalls. This analysis yields a twofold conclusion: first, relatively little uniformity exists among publishers in philosophy for respondi
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:22:19 | 只看該作者
Yi Ou,Lei Chen,Jianliang Xu,Theo H?rderistleblowers in recent times have been described as post-publication vigilantes for their efforts in securing corrections of the scholarly record, so the professional dangers of academic whistleblowing should not be understated.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:24:01 | 只看該作者
A Faceted Crawler for the Twitter Servicen that it hosts in one system but will leave other electronic versions unchanged (“The Platform Problem”). Quite frequently the original uncorrected versions of articles are uploaded on secondary websites outside the control of a publisher. These copies are more accessible to researchers than the co
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:06:08 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:24:03 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 11:17
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
芦山县| 开化县| 延寿县| 天津市| 郑州市| 稷山县| 广安市| 孝感市| 泰宁县| 布拖县| 陵川县| 丰都县| 林西县| 泰宁县| 夏河县| 定日县| 南宫市| 南丹县| 苗栗县| 德惠市| 柳林县| 深圳市| 怀柔区| 昭苏县| 青川县| 平远县| 南昌县| 江阴市| 麻栗坡县| 若尔盖县| 彭州市| 宽甸| 辽宁省| 龙山县| 布拖县| 松原市| 韶关市| 清远市| 柳河县| 灌阳县| 洪洞县|