Titlebook: Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance; The Contribution of Lorenzo Sacconi (Professor of Economics and Unicre Book 2011

一起平行

2662-6330 titutional and stakeholder theories of the firm, new rational choice and social contract normative models, self regulatory and soft law models, and the advances from behavioural economics.978-1-349-31462-1978-0-230-30211-2Series ISSN 2662-6330 Series E-ISSN 2662-6349

conduct

Virtues

Theoretical Model for CSI Localization,the corporation is the property of the stockholders, or if the board should owe fiduciary duties to the stakeholders in general. To date it does not seem that this issue has been resolved. One view became more powerful and prevalent at one time, but then its influence relatively declined in response

后來

Cardiac

反抗者

Maria Lodovica Gullino,Laura Vivanity (CSR) has grown exponentially, and sorting out the variety of arguments that academic researchers on, and political advocates of, corporate social responsibility have advanced is a Sisyphean task.. Confining itself to a highly selective review, the purpose of the present paper is to identify and

Arb853

Maria Lodovica Gullino,Laura Vivanikeholder model of corporate governance and objective function based on the extension of fiduciary duties towards all of the firm’s stakeholders (see section 2). A rationale for this idea is given firstly within the perspective of new institutional economic theory in terms of transaction costs effici

謙卑

Maria Lodovica Gullino,Laura Vivaniodel of corporate governance and objective function, based on the extension of fiduciary duties owed to the sole owner of the firm to all the company stakeholder (for this definition see part I, Sacconi, 2010a, .). As in the first part, CSR is also understood as a self-sustaining institution - i.e.

Insul島

彩色的蠟筆

Maria Lodovica Gullino,Laura Vivaniitors against the corporation, is a kind of special ‘concession’ made to these investors. Apparently, the default position against which this concession operates is that, more normally, these investors, as owners, would be . responsible for the conduct that they effect through the corporate form.. H