Titlebook: Copyright Perspectives; Past, Present and Pr Brian Fitzgerald,John Gilchrist Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 C

Concave

書目名稱Copyright Perspectives影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Copyright Perspectives影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Copyright Perspectives網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Copyright Perspectives網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Copyright Perspectives被引頻次




書目名稱Copyright Perspectives被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Copyright Perspectives年度引用




書目名稱Copyright Perspectives年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Copyright Perspectives讀者反饋




書目名稱Copyright Perspectives讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

受傷

Getting Started with the New User Interface,ting rulings of the U.S. courts reveal the problems posed by new forms of publishing online and demonstrate a compelling need for further harmonization between the Berne Convention, domestic laws and the practical realities of digital publishing. While a clearer consensus on what amounts to “simulta

一美元

invulnerable

MIR

accordance

Roman Law, Private Property and the Public Domain: Lessons for Copyright Policy,ight for a far greater term than is granted in respect of an invention. It may be that the time has come for a rethinking of the term of copyright. Rather than a fixed term after the death of the author or the composer or artist, irrespective of the nature of the work and the age of that author, com

accordance

萬花筒

An Islamic Perspective on the Theories of Intellectual Property, of wealth, abuse of rights and the encouragement for the dissemination of knowledge under Islamic Shari’a can be employed as a normative framework to design an IP system and policies that are not necessarily similar to their dominant counterparts. These principles, if integrated into the fabric IP

CRANK

Copyright, Fair Use and the Australian Constitution,r the original work..At the time of including the copyright power in the Australian Constitution, the UK Parliament’s understanding of “copyrights” included the notion of fair use as it had been developed in U.K. precedent. In this chapter we argue that the work “copyrights” in the Constitution take

草本植物

Duty and Control in Intermediary Copyright Liability: An Australian Perspective,ngement. By contrast, reasonable steps taken to prevent infringement are not relevant until after a duty is established. The judgment of Justices Gummow and Hayne in the High Court decision of . [2012] is used to demonstrate these claims.