Titlebook: Controversies in Medium of Instruction Reform; The Experience of Ho Shek Kam Tse,Wing Wah Ki,Mark Shiu Kee Shum Book 2021 Springer Nature S

能得到

Introduction,is used by teachers in the classroom, there is usually no dilemma about its medium of instruction (MOI). However, problems may arise if the language the child speaks at home differs from the one that the teacher is using in lessons, and this is very often the case in Hong Kong.

restrain

output

Evidence of Success of the MOI Reform,, the concern of the public was not just about the students’ subject learning improvement, but also (or even more) about the reform’s possible negative impacts on their English language standards and future prospects.

Maximize

,Review and “Fine-Tuning” of the MOI Reform Policy,unched in 1998, soon after the return of its sovereignty to China in 1997. Even though remarkable improvements to the quality of classroom teaching and learning in the CMI secondary schools had been observed, the disagreement in society about this MOI reform remained serious in the 2000s.

后來(lái)

tariff

endocardium

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-6282-0ce of language of instruction that they have. Without such knowledge, one might fail to appreciate the reasons why both Chinese and English are taught in Hong Kong, and how competence in both of these languages meets the needs of society. One will also fail to appreciate the problem arising out of t

Intervention

過(guò)濾

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-6282-0However, in 1997, the government announced that starting from September 1998, Chinese would be the default MOI for all schools. Those schools which wanted to use English as the medium of instruction (EMI) had to apply to the education authority for approval. The rationale for this change of policy i

下船