Titlebook: Controversial Geneticist and Creative Biologist; A Critical Review of Richard Goldschmidt,Leonie K. Piternick Book 1980 Springer Basel AG 1

隱語

Ecotype, Ecospecies, and Macroevolution,individual colonies. Though the taxonomist does not apply nomenclatural distinction to these categories below the subspecies, it is important to realize that in many cases, if not in all, further subdivisions would be possible upon the basis of still recognizable hereditary differences. A further im

florid

Conclusion,ersexes in crosses of different geographic races. Goldschmidt’s views on the structure of the chromosome and on the nature of the gene have largely been supplanted by different ideas based on studies of genes and chromosomes in the intervening years (Bakken). His influence as a theorist of genetics

Petechiae

,An Evaluation of Goldschmidt’s Work after Twenty Years,d Julius Seiler, became prominent zoological geneticists. But after Goldschmidt had joined the Kaiser Wilhelm Institut in 1914, he did not teach any more nor did he accept graduate students. He held an appointment as honorary professor at the University of Berlin and his colleague at the Kaiser Wilh

不持續(xù)就爆

A Provocative View of the Evolutionary Process,. Indeed, he was one of the chief architects of that biology, infusing a genetic perspective particularly into classical cytology and embryology. Eventually his attention became focused on the genetics of the evolutionary process.

HEAVY

Aids209

Views on the Nature of the Gene, the Structure and Function of the Chromosome, and Heterochromatic Mendelian genetic analyses of the Morgan school) changed eventually to outright rejection. when he considered the facts regarding position effects discovered by Sturtevant in 1925. in which physical rearrangements among the chromosomes lead to different activities of the same gene. He proposed an a

裹住

,The Historical Development of “Time Law of Intersexuality”and Its Philosophical Implications, twentieth century genetics might not have been better off had Goldschmidt never existed. Such a question underscores one of the vagaries of the history of science: a tendency to see events and people in terms only of progress toward the “right” idea. While it is true that Goldschmidt may be remembe

NIP

枕墊

Contributions to the Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, in Freiburg in Breisgau. While an assistant was showing us the institute, we were informed by a secretary that Professor Richard Goldschmidt, the Director of the Institut, wished to see us. I was astounded that a newly fledged Ph.D. was sought by this distinguished scientist. We found Professor Gol

extrovert

,Richard Benedict Goldschmidt (1878–1958): a Biographical Memoir,h of his life written in fulfillment of the traditional request of the National Academy of Sciences. In addition, he preserved many letters which he had received from colleagues all over the world and deposited them in the archives of the Library of the University of California at Berkeley. It would