找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning; Cities, Policies, an Tuna Tasan-Kok,Guy Baeten Book 2012 Springer Nature B.V. 2012 Entrepreneurialis

[復制鏈接]
樓主: HARDY
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 18:17:56 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:51:37 | 只看該作者
Neoliberal Planning: Does It Really Exist?,mith (2008) has declared neoliberalism ‘dead but dominant’, and some call for a shift in focus from analysis and critique to the exploration of possible postneoliberalisms (see for example Brand and Sekler (2009) in the theme issue on postneoliberalism in Development Dialogue).
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 23:20:36 | 只看該作者
,Elemente der Relativit?tstheorie,e actual/experienced urban fabric between the two. In this chapter an analysis of this disjuncture is undertaken, focusing on two of the metropolitan municipalities in the country. While telling a unique South African story, the chapter connects with the international literature on the impact of neoliberalism on planning.
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 05:49:37 | 只看該作者
Michael Linden,Martin Hautzingerities. In this way, the chapter argues, policy not only reproduces inequalities but also provides an individualised explanation for their existence and perpetuation. The chapter concludes by highlighting future research avenues and the value in re-thinking the cultural politics of neoliberal urban policy.
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 09:56:47 | 只看該作者
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 11:23:24 | 只看該作者
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 16:19:49 | 只看該作者
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 23:08:36 | 只看該作者
Book 2012us far been generally overlooked in planning theory and the analysis of planning practice. Offering insights from papers presented during a conference session at a meeting of the Association of American Geographers in Boston in 2008 and a number of commissioned chapters, this book fills this signifi
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 03:00:08 | 只看該作者
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 07:25:15 | 只看該作者
0924-5499 oliberalism and democratic urban evolution.Case studies from.This book argues that the concepts of ‘neoliberalism’ and ‘neoliberalisation,’ while in common use across the whole range of social sciences, have thus far been generally overlooked in planning theory and the analysis of planning practice.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 03:39
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
临邑县| 靖西县| 浦江县| 西华县| 孟州市| 漠河县| 珲春市| 鄢陵县| 开封市| 无极县| 皋兰县| 昭平县| 祁连县| 通渭县| 大邑县| 涞源县| 雷波县| 安吉县| 托里县| 文登市| 井研县| 稷山县| 白玉县| 柏乡县| 东莞市| 江城| 祁门县| 陆河县| 曲阳县| 静乐县| 田阳县| 三原县| 霍林郭勒市| 灵山县| 鹤山市| 罗江县| 崇礼县| 滕州市| 江津市| 满城县| 呼玛县|