找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Contextualism, Factivity and Closure; A Union That Should Stefano Leardi,Nicla Vassallo Book 2018 The Author(s), under exclusive license t

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Magnanimous
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 05:23:49 | 只看該作者
Peter Ritz,Peter Marti,Bruno Thürlimannended version turns out to entail a radical revision of factivity that seems extremely unpalatable. The minimalistic version of contextualism, on the other hand, seems to be rather unappealing due to its non-Moorean nature.
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 08:11:04 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 12:23:03 | 只看該作者
Book 2018xtualism, an important innovation in contemporary epistemology, enabling readers to gain a better understanding of the various solutions to the factivity problem. As the authors demonstrate, each explanation is based on a different interpretation of the problem.??.Divided into seven chapters, the bo
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:29:39 | 只看該作者
Institut für Baustatik. Versuchsberichte the context of the knowledge attributor. According to a recent objection labelled “the factivity problem”, contextualism, if combined with the principle of factivity and with the principle of closure, would turn out to be an inconsistent theory. In this chapter are presented the contextualist stanc
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 23:46:18 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 00:37:31 | 只看該作者
Hansruedi Ganz,Bruno Thürlimannio knows. that Oliver knows. that .”, holds. Here we will scrutinize two different solutions that propose to reconsider the role of this kind of ascriptions. The first is due to Brueckner and Buford and maintains that asymmetrical knowledge ascriptions should be refuted; the contextualists would not
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 04:30:30 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:46:58 | 只看該作者
Peter Ritz,Peter Marti,Bruno Thürlimann factivity problem, have to be rephrased to account for the contextualist understanding of the semantics of “know”. It could be wondered, therefore, if other principles that might tacitly play a role in the argument of the conundrum need a similar treatment. In this chapter we will try to reply to t
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 16:06:58 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 18:02:56 | 只看該作者
Stefano Leardi,Nicla VassalloAnalyzes an inconsistency within epistemic contextualism known as the factivity problem.Details different solutions to the factivity problem developed by key philosophers.Identifies three main approac
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-25 14:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
义马市| 嘉善县| 崇文区| 阜宁县| 卢龙县| 通榆县| 镇雄县| 永兴县| 怀化市| 安国市| 中超| 昌乐县| 平果县| 浙江省| 富民县| 廉江市| 宿迁市| 牙克石市| 涟水县| 平和县| 寿宁县| 梧州市| 邹平县| 成安县| 双鸭山市| 神池县| 白河县| 宜丰县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 白朗县| 宿迁市| 商水县| 曲阳县| 佛冈县| 万全县| 蓝山县| 措美县| 屯留县| 班玛县| 会宁县| 胶南市|