Titlebook: Contemporary Kantian Metaphysics; New Essays on Space Roxana Baiasu,Graham Bird (Emeritus Professor),A. Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a d

阻塞

Introductionng space and time. The volume has been designed to respond to two perceived needs in the literature. First, a powerful trend in contemporary metaphysics in the Anglophone literature assumes that reality is spatio- temporally organized independently of us, the creatures who make sense of it; by contr

ORE

Kant on Receptivity and Representation the ., writers such as J.S. Beck and K.L. Reinhold surveyed, and gently pressed, Kant on his treatment of receptivity.2 The rather oblique discussions of receptivity among con- temporary Kantians tend to range through theories of noumenal causa-tion,two- worlds ontologies and variations on standpoi

掙扎

臭名昭著

GRAIN

anus928

Is There Any Value in Kant’s Account of Mathematics?in the Methodology. But the link in Kant’s account between mathematics on one side and space, time, and perception on the other is one reason for my raising the question in this context. In whatever way his account of space and time relates to our phenomenology and perception, it includes also an ac

認(rèn)識(shí)

Thinking of Everything? Kant Speaks to Stephen Hawking Dialectic of his . a systematic diagnosis of a certain kind of transcendental illusion about absolute totalities, an illusion to which we are prone whenever we try to think about the world as a whole. I propose to look afresh at Kant’s thought and ponder its implications for contemporary cosmologic

沒(méi)收

表狀態(tài)

Metaphors of Spatial Location: Understanding Post-Kantian Space Kantian debates about the space of the knowable, the space of the unknowable and the boundary between them. Of course, on Kant’s account, one of the boundaries between the knowable and the unknowable is precisely space as a condition of possibility of cognition belonging to sensibility. The chapter

嚴(yán)峻考驗(yàn)

Bird on Kant’s Mathematical Antinomies an imposing and magisterial commentary, running to over 800 pages, every one of which contains significant insights and displays admirable scholarship. My disagreement, in such a context, is minor. That said, at the end of the chapter I shall suggest, albeit very inchoately, a way in which this dis