找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics; Jason T. Eberl Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 The Phoenix case.alte

[復制鏈接]
查看: 9132|回復: 60
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:44:28 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics
編輯Jason T. Eberl
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/237/236426/236426.mp4
概述Offers a comprehensive and nuanced treatment of a wide range of bioethical issues debated by Catholic scholars.Includes contributions by nationally and internationally recognized Catholic scholars.Con
叢書名稱Philosophy and Medicine
圖書封面Titlebook: Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics;  Jason T. Eberl Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 The Phoenix case.alte
描述.This volume comprises various viewpoints representing a Catholic perspective on contemporary practices in medicine and biomedical research. The Roman Catholic Church has had a significant impact upon the formulation and application of moral values and principles to a wide range of controversial issues in bioethics. Catholic leaders, theologians, and bioethicists have elucidated and marshaled arguments to support the Church’s definitive positions on several bioethical issues, such as abortion, euthanasia, and reproductive cloning. Not all bioethical issues, however, have been definitively addressed by Catholic authorities, and some Church teachings allow for differing applications in diverse circumstances. Moreover, as new biomedical technologies emerge, Church authorities rely on experts in science, medicine, philosophy, theology, law, and other disciplines to advise them. Such experts continue to debate issues related to reproduction, genetics, end-of-life care, and health care policy. This volume will be a valuable resource for scholars in bioethics or Catholic studies, who will benefit from the nuanced arguments offered based on the latest research. This volume is also instruct
出版日期Book 2017
關鍵詞The Phoenix case; alternative sources of stem cells; bioethical laws; bioethics and humanities; bioethic
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55766-3
isbn_softcover978-3-319-85740-4
isbn_ebook978-3-319-55766-3Series ISSN 0376-7418 Series E-ISSN 2215-0080
issn_series 0376-7418
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG 2017
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics被引頻次




書目名稱Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics年度引用




書目名稱Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics讀者反饋




書目名稱Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:44:49 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:19:07 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:46:30 | 只看該作者
Universit?tskolloquien zur Schizophreniearily related to the ethical permissibility of deliberately procured abortion, particularly leading up and in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark . and . decisions in 1973 that legalized the provision of abortion services. In these decisions, the Court explicitly avoided addressing the que
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:03:28 | 只看該作者
Michael Richter,Markus D. Flückigerit is difficult to determine the precise ontological status of the early conceptus. Biological data alone can neither reveal the metaphysical status of nascent human beings, nor does it denote the ethical implications of their organismal identity. One must not confuse biological, metaphysical and mo
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:21:11 | 只看該作者
Michael Richter,Markus D. Flückiger of potential. Crucial for understanding the moral significance of potentiality is the fact that mindless organisms have interests but only in their healthy development. Unlike most kinds of organisms that develop minds, the operations of a healthy human mind are of a sophistication and range that b
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:49:37 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8274-2934-6lic doctrine speaks of persons as substances of a rational nature, and though it seems clear that anencephalic fetuses and infants are clearly human organisms, the connection between personhood and the species . is not always clear. Recent bioethical claims from the Congregation for the Doctrine of
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:16:52 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:25:12 | 只看該作者
What is Microsoft Dynamics AX?,ancy with her fifth child and was suffering pulmonary hypertension. According to her physicians, her risk of dying if she were to continue with the pregnancy was “close to 100 percent” (Hagerty 2010). Sr. Margaret McBride, a member of the hospital’s ethics committee, consulted on the case and approv
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:52:51 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 23:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
台南县| 郴州市| 云梦县| 阳高县| 汕头市| 广饶县| 北宁市| 察雅县| 四会市| 太保市| 汾西县| 泸水县| 白山市| 涟源市| 彭阳县| 兴和县| 遂平县| 甘谷县| 庄河市| 萍乡市| 东乡族自治县| 旅游| 金华市| 黄浦区| 永定县| 邵阳县| 营山县| 罗平县| 清河县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 延寿县| 连城县| 齐齐哈尔市| 巍山| 西乌| 北流市| 石阡县| 错那县| 安塞县| 白朗县| 富宁县|