Titlebook: Contagionism Catches On; Medical Ideology in Margaret DeLacy Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 contagionism.1

exhibit

John Haygarth and the Campaign for Contagion,Infirmary to isolate contagious patients and campaigning for government interventions to promote health. His dogmatic approach created controversy when he waded into disputes about acute diseases that seemed to defy his rules, exposing some of the underlying assumptions and practices of Enlightenment knowledge production.

goodwill

aesthetician

Book 2017ry, the British medical profession was divided between traditionalists, who attributed acute diseases to the interaction of internal imbalances with external factors such as weather, and reformers, who blamed contagious pathogens. The reformers, who were often “outsiders,” English Nonconformists or

Largess

持續(xù)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-29542-7t of the eighteenth century and beyond. Linnaeus’s theory did not become part of the contagionist mainstream but it was never completely abandoned. However, the critical impact of his theory was not the idea of animate pathogenesis in itself but its effect on his disease taxonomy, which was then adapted by Edinburgh professor William Cullen.

stratum-corneum

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-29541-0here was another significant mid-century innovation: the first dispensary to offer home visiting to patients, founded by the Methodist leader John Wesley. Over the next generation, small droplets of contagionist ideas would become a steady stream.

Lignans

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-29545-8d the reformers to close ranks and sharpen their claims about the behavior of contagious diseases. Their victory literally institutionalized contagionism, at the moment when a new generation of reformers was beginning to redefine the issues at stake.

蔓藤圖飾

輕快帶來(lái)危險(xiǎn)

樂(lè)器演奏者