Titlebook: Contagion, Isolation, and Biopolitics in Victorian London; Matthew L. Newsom Kerr Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s

行業(yè)

syring

Isolation, Liberalism, Biopower,ule and administration placed a significant amount of the burden for governing epidemics with the governed themselves. It argues that sanitary detention should be viewed as an expression of biopower, and that biopolitical mechanisms (as suggested by Foucault) are best understood as appropriate to liberal governmentality.

CHASE

Isolation Within Isolation: The Public and Personal Politics of Hospital Infection,stigation and construction of the hygienic body. The fever hospital emerged as an institution dedicated to the public. It became a place not only for establishing external perimeters but also internal partitions and blockades—seen in practices of “isolation within isolation” such as partial walls, glass partitions, and rituals of barrier nursing.

安撫

COMA

ANTIC

衰老

萬(wàn)花筒

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-29534-2zation of the London isolation hospitals set the stage for a contentious nationwide debate over removing the pauper penalty for all forms of parochial medical assistance. This chapter considers how debates about hospital fees, rate-supported medical aid, and pauperism shaped the biopolitics of citizenship.

消極詞匯

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-29536-6ics of the modern city. The MAB hospital network exemplifies the “naturalization of the urban,” by which the biological averages, propensities, and dispositions of contagion emerge as special concerns to government precisely because they provide ..

creditor

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-29537-3s the history of medical cartography with practices of social inspection and examines how disease maps invited the London public to place itself in the position of observer and to see itself through the eye of surveillance.