Titlebook: Consonant Change in English Worldwide; Synchrony Meets Diac Daniel Schreier Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publisher

高深莫測(cè)

切割

Lecture Notes in Computer Scienceal change alike. This has a phonological motivation, namely through co-articulation and assimilation processes, but also a typological one, namely through the marked, ‘unnatural’ status of consonant clusters in the world’s languages. The strategies used to modify clusters and thus to adapt syllable

FLIP

Palgrave Studies in Language History and Language Changehttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/235833.jpg

BROW

Introduction,contrast, the consonantal system has been considered as more stable and changes in individual consonants or groups of consonants have been neglected. This is illustrated by Finegan (1990: 78, 80), who points out that the diachronic development of English was primarily one of vowel rather than consonant change:

真

重畫(huà)只能放棄

推延

手勢(shì)

Vertebra

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85939-8itial and -final contexts, which is a function of their positioning and a major influencing factor on the rate and trajectory of this process. Consequently, before we begin with quantitative analyses of final CCR in English around the world, we outline the differences and some major implications of cluster environment.

輕快走過(guò)

Initial Cluster Reduction in English,ely through deletion of one of the segments) or, in other words, it entails that a CC- becomes homophonous with a single C- (usually the second segment of the cluster prior to aphaeresis), with which it effectively merges.