Titlebook: Conjugality; Marriage and Marriag Heather Brook Book 20071st edition Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2007 Assimilatio

補(bǔ)給線

書目名稱Conjugality影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Conjugality影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Conjugality網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Conjugality網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Conjugality被引頻次




書目名稱Conjugality被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Conjugality年度引用




書目名稱Conjugality年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Conjugality讀者反饋




書目名稱Conjugality讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

meretricious

http://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/235557.jpg

CRUDE

faddish

Ralph Back,Martin Büchi,Emil Sekerinskime marry in church, some in hot-air balloons. In recent years, not just wedding ceremonies, but marriage itself has become (arguably) more negotiable and less conventional. Certainly in developed western nations like the United States, marriage is nowhere near as “compulsory” as it once was. These d

defile

可商量

Madhumita Kumari,Sheela Chandral recently these rarely attended to the ways racism has figured in marriage law. However, a flurry of new research has begun to consider marriage’s recent and shamefully rich history as a mechanism for policing “race” and protecting white privilege.. As a whole, such research aims to illustrate the

可商量

鉗子

Assignment

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27490-4in the available structures by shaping their relationships to “pass” as straight, or by unhappily conforming to marriage norms in other ways. Many, at least in recent times, have found ways to live outside of marriage, and as such are not alone. As we saw in Chapter 3, historically, transsexuals and

極大痛苦

Reference Series in Phytochemistry a regulatory system is unraveling. As a mechanism of status relying on patriarchal and heterosexist regulatory orders, it is no longer viable. Theoretically and experientially, the old forms are being rejected. Where cohabitation counts, for certain purposes, as “marriage,” where covenant marriage,