Titlebook: Conflicts in Curriculum Theory; Challenging Hegemoni Jo?o M. Paraskeva Book 2021Latest edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author

單片眼鏡

Double Scandal Itinerant Curriculum Theory as the Subaltern Non-abyssal Turn,ntially, the research lens for qualitative approaches. In this context, the chapter examines curriculum as scandal, a lethal ideological device produces an epistemicide—the killing of knowledge—epistemological havoc cooked up daily in the process of qualitative studies promoting and legitimizing a specific modern Western Eurocentric episteme.

lymphoma

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77420-2conflict; conflicts; curriculum; Curriculum Theory; education; knowledge; nature; social justice

的染料

978-3-030-77422-6The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl

Fabric

Jo?o M. ParaskevaProvides a new critical language, practice, and theory in curriculum studies.Champions the struggle against the curriculum epistemide.Introduces the itinerant curriculum theory as a post-epistemicidal

硬化

拘留

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-38185-6 produced by hegemonic traditions, that frames curriculum knowledge as neutral. The chapter unpacks how different critical theorists restructure and complexify the question formulated by Spencer—“what knowledge is of most worth?” In such context, the chapter unearths curriculum as a social construct

使閉塞

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-38185-6led by four groups for the American curriculum since the turn of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century. The chapter provides a very innovative approach by scrutinizing such battles within the context of broader social issues framing US society such as the challenges place

領(lǐng)袖氣質(zhì)

Exaggerate

Transient Signals on Transmission Linesyler was able to introduce a particular rationale in the field. The chapter excavates such rationale and how it becomes the dominant rationale in the field. In doing so, the chapter examines the structure of the Tyler matrix—(1) what educational purposes should the school seek to attain? (2) What ed

GEST

Andrew F. Peterson,Gregory D. Durginof the curriculum right before and throughout World War II was called life adjustment education. It examines crucial reports such as . which repeated the argument that high school did not adequately prepare students for their future lives. The chapter analyzes Prosser response to such a report—in wh