Titlebook: Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment; Paula Satne,Krisanna M. Scheiter Book 2022 Springer Nature Sw

abstemious

triptans

fetter

beta-carotene

Kant on Punishment, Pardon, and Forgivenessderstood in terms of a maxim to protest a wrongdoing, and not simply in terms of feelings like resentment. Forgiveness should be understood as the maxim to cease moral punishment. Crucially, the reason for forgiveness, on the Kantian interpretation advanced here, is that we have a duty to be forgiving, akin to the duty of beneficence.

表狀態(tài)

esoteric

periodontitis

Transforming the Hong Kong Legal Machinee different chapters. The chapters examine the merits and pitfalls of common reactive attitudes to wrongdoing, such as anger, hatred, resentment, and forgiveness, taking into account both historical perspectives and contemporary debates. The introduction explains some of the philosophical debates ab

與野獸博斗者

Canary

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16928-6derstand why the stoic sage will not be subject to anger, I present a worry for Seneca’s view: given that the sage cannot be harmed, what justifies the sage in punishing wrongdoers, or those who sought to cause her harm? I then explicate Seneca’s curative stance on punishment, which he analogizes to

萬神殿

Lean Six Sigma: The Joint Commission, ‘internalization’. His account calls into question whether forgiveness is ever really justified, or whether it could ever possibly be virtuous. So we might well wonder why a discussion of Spinoza’s psychology of hatred belongs in a discussion about forgiveness, reconciliation, revenge, or ameliorat