找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Confiscation in Private International Law; Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam,Pieter Adriaanse Book 1956 Springer Science+Business Media Dord

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: CK828
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 10:37:55 | 只看該作者
Extra-Territorial Confiscations,eater unanimity. Thus the validity of extra-territorial confiscations is with few exceptions. rejected by the case law. This is not to be wondered at. When a government aims at extending such a drastic violation of the principle of protection of private property beyond its frontiers, the foreign . w
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 15:42:12 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 20:36:38 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 23:41:14 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8915-6Germany; international law; private international law
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:51:41 | 只看該作者
978-94-011-8240-9Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1956
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:25:29 | 只看該作者
Daniel Ankarloo Ph.D.,Torbj?rn Friberg Ph.D.e political and philosophic background of the . and despite the fact that it was preceded by extensive expropriations without compensation in the course of the French revolution., it can hardly be denied that the idea thus formulated and subsequently adopted in the French Constitution of 1791, in th
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 13:16:04 | 只看該作者
Geoffrey Sherington,Craig Campbellhe question of validity may appear in different ways. Most frequent is the following case. The confiscating state, or its assignee, exports the confiscated goods and an action for recovery is brought before a foreign court either against the confiscating state, where the latter still claims a title
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 16:24:33 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 22:42:26 | 只看該作者
Victoria-María MacDonald,Mark Nillesntries contains concrete rules in this respect. It is even remarkable that in England and the United States where common law plays the major role, part of the questions connected with confiscation are covered by legislation., which is not the case in most other countries. Judges therefore have taken
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:42:20 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603462tandards. Some decisions proved to have confined themselves to the case at issue; in others, however, more general principles were laid down. Since legislation on this point is lacking in most countries we framed some rules which should be regarded as self-supporting rules of private international l
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-16 19:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
邓州市| 惠东县| 桓仁| 应城市| 雅安市| 灌南县| 固始县| 巫山县| 南宁市| 寻乌县| 淮北市| 龙游县| 辽源市| 新和县| 兰考县| 论坛| 大洼县| 麦盖提县| 三亚市| 锦屏县| 三门峡市| 南昌县| 香格里拉县| 龙南县| 隆林| 雅江县| 友谊县| 乌什县| 土默特左旗| 怀仁县| 辽源市| 青浦区| 弥渡县| 泊头市| 永兴县| 福海县| 光泽县| 云梦县| 清流县| 河曲县| 婺源县|