Titlebook: Conducting Systematic Reviews in Sport, Exercise, and Physical Activity; David Tod Textbook 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Aut

ellagic-acid

Georg Peters,Martin Lampart,Richard Weberample, is sometimes not specific enough to deal with each of the variations and specific situations investigators encounter. Such books would be tremendously long and are not feasible. For this chapter, I invited systematic reviewers and method experts to identify the top advice they would give students and colleagues.

Ergots

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12263-8systematic review methodology; sport psychology; sport and exercise research; physical activity researc

并置

maudtin

可行

浪費(fèi)物質(zhì)

抵制

放牧

https://doi.org/10.1007/11574798e statements are the compass equivalent, orienting reviewers towards clear destinations. In sport, exercise, and physical activity, systematic review purpose statements vary in their specificity, influencing readers’ ability to understand a project’s direction. Vague review questions turn readers of

padding

無(wú)可非議

P. Samanta,Mihir K. Chakrabortyuisite for?identifying relevant research. Well-constructed, clear, and explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria assist decision making consistency. In this chapter, I focus on inclusion and exclusion criteria, explain their benefits, provide guidelines on their construction and use, and illustrate