Titlebook: Conciliatory Democracy; From Deliberation To Martin Ebeling Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Jean-Jacques Rou

不連貫

RAFF

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2193-5al circumstances. In a concluding remark, it shows how the conciliatory conception produces congruence between the normative and epistemic dimensions of democracy and thus constitutes an answer to both the normative and the epistemic significance of political disagreement and a solution to the meta-problem of democratic theory.

foppish

https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57743-6Jean-Jacques Rousseau; contemporary philosophy; public choice theory; conciliation; social epistemology;

CEDE

hauteur

http://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/235088.jpg

幻想

Jürg P. Seiler,Olga Kroftová,Vladislav Eybls this insight which connects his political philosophy with the conciliatory conception of democracy put forward in this book. The chapter elucidates the background assumptions of Rousseau’s views and his famous notion of the general will. It then goes on to explain the complex relations between the

ESO

Charity Metz,Melanie Johns Cupp citizens whom they treat as equal normative authorities. This gives immediate normative significance to political disagreements about different conceptions of justice and legitimacy. Furthermore, this leads many deliberative democrats to endorse the reasonable acceptability of justifications offere

是突襲

Legal/Regulatory Aspects of Herbal Products regard each other as equal epistemic authorities on justice, that is, as prima facie equally reliable judges of the rightness of political decisions according to a procedure-independent criterion of rightness. The conditions of deliberative democracy are widespread decentered deliberation about com

Constituent

僵硬