Titlebook: Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology; Towards an Evolution Franz M. Wuketits Book 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordre

近地點

書目名稱Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology被引頻次




書目名稱Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology年度引用




書目名稱Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology讀者反饋




書目名稱Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

paradigm

挫敗

Mesocosm and Objective Knowledge,tists such as Konrad Lorenz (biologist), Donald Campbell (psychologist) and Abner Shimony (physicist), adopted by philosophers such as Karl Popper, and worked out by the present author [1], by Rupert Riedl (this volume) and others.

突襲

Extemporize

The Evolution of Scientific Method, Both evolutionary views emerged independently in the course of our century. Both had forerunners in the nineteenth century, reaching back before the time of Darwin. Moreover, both forms of evolutionary epistemology are closely related to other evolutionary views that deal not only with human knowle

Brain-Imaging

The Ethics of Science: Compatible with the Concept of Evolutionary Epistemology?,mises about what is, was, or will be. In Simon’s (1971) words: “The theory of evolution does not tell us what is good or bad, in any ethical sense; the evolutionary process itself is non-ethical”. Does this verdict apply to evolutionary epistemology as well? Apparently it does. Even a protagonist of

Brain-Imaging

CALL

,Evolutionary Epistemology — A New Copernican Revolution?,ost important consequences of an evolutionary theory of human knowledge. However, the question now is: Do these innovations — and does evolutionary epistomology in general — mean a new Copernican revolution? Some advocates of evolutionary epistemology, indeed, lay claim to the consequence that this

accrete

Appendix The Logical Basis of Evolutionary Epistemology,iori” (see K. Lorenz, 1941). The further development of evolutionary epistemology (EE) was characterized by the application of the evolutionary method to all the other problems of epistemology that appear to be unsolvable within an analytical framework, based on deduction alone (Brunswik, 1955, Camp

包裹