Titlebook: Computing Meaning; Volume 1 Harry Bunt,Reinhard Muskens Book 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999 Parsing.algorithms.computa

Infinitesimal

ARM

內(nèi)疚

ich they have a scope very different from that indicated by the surface sequence of expressions in which they occur — a problem which cannot be reduced to positing referential uses of indefinites; cf. (Farkas, 1981; Abusch, 1994). Various computational and formal systems have tackled this ambiguity

Armada

95), and has given rise to new theories of logical form based on various kinds of ‘dynamic semantics’.. Although these theories appear to account for donkey anaphora in a natural way, they have not had much impact so far on knowledge representation in AI. This is surprising since — as I will argue —

Employee

s that take a more generalized discourse view (Prüst et al, 1993; Asher, 1993; Kehler, 1994) have suggested the need for an approach which eschews a purely syntactic or semantic approach, but rather is conditioned by discourse structure. Kehler, for instance, has modified the approach of Hankamer an

Adornment

resupposition projection (see e.g. Beaver 1997:983). The main insight is that there is an interesting correspondence between the behavior of anaphoric pronouns in discourse and the projection of presuppositions in complex sentences. Van der Sandt proposes to ‘resolve’ presuppositions just like anaph

抒情短詩(shī)

https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0023017dy. We will show that, contrary to traditional approaches (Zin-garelli, 1995; Serianni, 1988), there is no need to assume that spatial prepositions in Italian are almost systematically ambiguous between a . and a . interpretation. Such an assumption, which is made in analogy with Germanic languages,

avulsion

香料

Computing Meaning978-94-011-4231-1Series ISSN 0924-4662 Series E-ISSN 2215-034X

異常