Titlebook: Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems; 5th International Wo Jo?o Leite,Paolo Torroni Conference proceedings 2005 Springer-Verlag Berli

Presbyopia

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13920-1eclarative specification of agent control. Control is given in terms of ., which define in a declarative way the possible alternative behaviours of agents, depending on the particular circumstances of the (perceived) external environment in which they are situated, on the internal state of the agent

殺蟲(chóng)劑

描述

奇怪

聚集

Wilfried Brauer,Siegfried Münchonsider the following two problems: given two logic programs .. and .., which have the sets of answer sets . and ., respectively; (i) find a program . which has the set of answer sets such that . = .; (ii) find a program . which has the set of answer sets such that . = .. A program . satisfying the

FIR

Studien- und Forschungsführer Informatikrguments. In order to be flexible, this protocol is defined as a combination of a set of conversation policies. These policies are formalized as a set of dialogue games. The protocol is specified using two types of dialogue games: entry dialogue game and chaining dialogue games. The protocol termina

雜役

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-97180-8n that a given protocol implementation is “conformant” w.r.t. the abstract specification of it. In this work we tackle those aspects of the conformance verification issue, that regard the dependence/independence of conformance from the agent private state in the case of logic, individual agents, set

Arteriography

SCORE

BLAZE

Literatur zur Wirtschaftsinformatik,n its own best interests. When addressing multiple goals, the rational action may not be obvious. Equipping the agents with decision-theoretic methods allows the agent to mathematically evaluate the risks, uncertainty, and benefits of the various available courses of action. Using this evaluation, a