Titlebook: Compatible Forest Management; Robert A. Monserud,Richard W. Haynes,Adelaide C. J Book 2003 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2003 Silvi

打算

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6732-4ntegrity (Szaro et al. 1999). Because many issues emerge at the landscape scale, it is an essential scale for addressing compatibility and tradeoffs among land use objectives when policy decisions are made.

FLIRT

John R. Weeks,Allan G. Hill,Justin Stolerbecause of logistical and administrative problems (Carpenter 1998, Monserud 2002). Therefore, I begin at the scale of the forest stand, the unit of forest management, and then move on to the watershed scale.

哄騙

John R. Weeks,Allan G. Hill,Justin Stoler resources over time. Such models can then make spatially dependent predictions such as insect contagion effects, habitat availability for wildlife species, potential fire risk, aesthetics, or reduction in timber yields because of management constraints on adjacent land (Barrett 1997).

流浪者

Sustainable Development Goals Seriesnagement approaches within individual ownerships. This chapter discusses the evolving mix of management regimes, the conditions that influence their adoption, expected trends in forest management, and the effects of these trends on timber harvest potential.

Atrium

On Optimal Arrangements of Binary Sensors active management (Hunter 1999). Now attention is shifting to second-growth forests where the public is concerned about biodiversity and ecosystem health (Hunter 1999, Lindenmayer and Franklin 2002, Shields et al. 2002).

Heresy

Experimental Approaches to Joint Forest Productionbecause of logistical and administrative problems (Carpenter 1998, Monserud 2002). Therefore, I begin at the scale of the forest stand, the unit of forest management, and then move on to the watershed scale.

carotid-bruit

BURSA

成份

溫順