Titlebook: Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia; Productivist Models Mason M. S. Kim Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

搭話

書目名稱Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia被引頻次




書目名稱Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia年度引用




書目名稱Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia讀者反饋




書目名稱Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Presbycusis

What Drives the Institutional Divergence of Productivist Welfare Capitalism?,ity of the concept and its operationalization (Hudson and Kühner 2009), we cannot overlook the fact that it offers a compelling theoretical framework to understand the key nature of social policy development in East Asia.

貨物

Conclusion,The authoritarian regime established in Taiwan after the 1949 Chinese Civil War was very much in the same position as Korea. During the 1950s and well into the 1960s, the Cold War played a central role in the development of the political institutions and economic structure. The authoritarian Kuomint

Intersect

bypass

ostensible

ostensible

Travelling and Driving Around: Road Novels,elfare states have evolved into a number of subtypes with systematic variations, what are the driving forces behind these variations? In short, how can we understand the presumed continuity and change of today’s East Asian welfare regime?

HUMID

Introduction,elfare states have evolved into a number of subtypes with systematic variations, what are the driving forces behind these variations? In short, how can we understand the presumed continuity and change of today’s East Asian welfare regime?

Corporeal

https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0080017development (Woo-Cumings 1999). Within this developmental paradigm, a strong commitment to . social welfare is regarded as inefficient and wasteful. This is why East Asian developmental states have espoused certain forms of institutional arrangements of productivist welfare capitalism (PWC) since the early stage of industrialization.

Minatory

Three Cases of Productivist Welfare Capitalism,development (Woo-Cumings 1999). Within this developmental paradigm, a strong commitment to . social welfare is regarded as inefficient and wasteful. This is why East Asian developmental states have espoused certain forms of institutional arrangements of productivist welfare capitalism (PWC) since the early stage of industrialization.