Titlebook: Comparative Theology Among Multiple Modernities; Cultivating Phenomen Paul S. Chung Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(

EVADE

Melatonin

Comparative Theology, Religious Discourse, and Phenomenological Imagination,ertz, and Gadamer for the viable project of articulating theological phenomenology and comparative theology. Phenomenology of lifeworld facilitates our elucidation of comparative theology in engagement with sociology of religion in Weber, Geertz, and critical theory.

亞麻制品

Phenomenological Elucidation: Karl Barth and Emmanuel Levinas,cal frame of reference. Our elucidation focuses upon the .-in-difference between two great thinkers, Barth and Levinas, especially regarding their respective critique of Heidegger. This elucidation facilitates grounding our model of critical comparative theology in regard to Clooney and Troetlsch.

insert

Theological Audacity, Analogical Relationality, and Religions,de of thought (Anselm) and role of Feuerbach are explicated in Barth’s understanding of revelation and religion. I seek to develop Barth’s analogical mode of thought in light of analogical relationality in critical exegesis of his complicated theology of the speech-act in ., in critical view of the Catholic teaching of .

混雜人

Epilogue: Comparative Theology and the Postcolonial,ities; then, it entails a deliberation of the significance of comparative theology in the postcolonial context, especially with respect to Foucault and Edward Said. This epilogue concludes with interreligious illumination and prayerful exchange in a comparative study of Bonhoeffer’s poem of . and bodhisattva prayer.

雜色

nces the horizon in the comparative study of religion for a .This book presents a heuristic and critical study of comparative theology in engagement with phenomenological methodology and sociological inquiry. It elucidates a postcolonial study of religion in the context of multiple modernities..978-3-319-86345-0978-3-319-58196-5

四指套

Introduction: Comparative Theologies and Multiple Modernities,al foundation and elaboration). David Tracy presents public theology in ways of correlating it analogically with the comparative study of religion. On the other hand, Francis Clooney develops a commentarial approach to comparative theology, utilizing Tracy’s analogical imagination. Clooney’s positio

一瞥

使高興