找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Commonsense Pluralism about Truth; An Empirical Defence Joseph Ulatowski Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 End

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 23747|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:05:33 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Commonsense Pluralism about Truth
副標(biāo)題An Empirical Defence
編輯Joseph Ulatowski
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/231/230321/230321.mp4
概述Addresses a gap in the literature by foregrounding the work of Arne Naess and approaches in experimental philosophy.Outlines the case for an innovative theory of pluralism about truth, endoxic alethic
圖書封面Titlebook: Commonsense Pluralism about Truth; An Empirical Defence Joseph Ulatowski Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 End
描述.Truth is a pervasive feature of ordinary language, deserving of systematic study, and few theorists of truth have endeavoured to chronicle the tousled conceptual terrain forming the non-philosopher’s ordinary view. In this book, the author recasts the philosophical treatment of truth in light of historical and recent work in experimental philosophy. He argues that the commonsense view of truth is deeply fragmented along two axes, across different linguistic discourses and among different demographics, termed in the book as .endoxic alethic pluralism. .To defend this view, four conclusions must be reached: (1) endoxic alethic pluralism should be compatible with how the everyday person uses truth, (2) the common conception of truth should be derivable from empirical data, (3) this descriptive metaphysical project is one aspect of a normative theory of truth, and (4) endoxic alethic pluralism is at least partially immune to challenges facing the ecological method in experimental philosophy and alethic pluralism.?.
出版日期Book 2017
關(guān)鍵詞Endoxic alethic pluralism; Experimental philosophy; Metaphysics; Ecology; Empirical semantics; Arne N?ss;
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69465-8
isbn_softcover978-3-319-88782-1
isbn_ebook978-3-319-69465-8
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Commonsense Pluralism about Truth影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Commonsense Pluralism about Truth影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Commonsense Pluralism about Truth網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Commonsense Pluralism about Truth網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Commonsense Pluralism about Truth被引頻次




書目名稱Commonsense Pluralism about Truth被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Commonsense Pluralism about Truth年度引用




書目名稱Commonsense Pluralism about Truth年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Commonsense Pluralism about Truth讀者反饋




書目名稱Commonsense Pluralism about Truth讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:44:18 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:39:02 | 只看該作者
Jürgen H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik,Uwe Warnerand that responses merely provide a theorist with a wide topographical view of the commonsense conceptual terrain. It is our theoretical responsibility to argue for any philosophical conclusion, but that can be done from the armchair. The second part of the chapter shows the ecological approach in a
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:15:57 | 只看該作者
Jürgen H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik,Uwe Warnerenerally assumed that the ordinary notion of truth aligns with their own intuitions about truth, data show that philosophers and non-philosophers’ notions of truth fail to align. Data exist showing that people’s responses to survey questions inquiring about a view of truth are incompatible with phil
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:01:06 | 只看該作者
Jürgen H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik,Uwe Warner methodological challenges. Methodological challenges suggest that empirical studies are irrelevant, suffer from poor experimental design or statistical analyses, or the folk suffer from serious confusion. Substantive challenges are those criticisms almost any alethic pluralism will have to face, in
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:17:51 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69465-8Endoxic alethic pluralism; Experimental philosophy; Metaphysics; Ecology; Empirical semantics; Arne N?ss;
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:16:52 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:02:38 | 只看該作者
Joseph UlatowskiAddresses a gap in the literature by foregrounding the work of Arne Naess and approaches in experimental philosophy.Outlines the case for an innovative theory of pluralism about truth, endoxic alethic
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:39:02 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:42:41 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 03:28
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
绥宁县| 新龙县| 峨眉山市| 蕉岭县| 五寨县| 孟州市| 龙泉市| 文山县| 长乐市| 建昌县| 精河县| 河东区| 宁津县| 宾川县| 鸡东县| 仁寿县| 大城县| 民县| 太白县| 沈阳市| 凤凰县| 玉屏| 萍乡市| 怀安县| 常宁市| 深圳市| 云龙县| 南宫市| 于都县| 阆中市| 长顺县| 陇川县| 乃东县| 元江| 托里县| 合作市| 怀仁县| 都兰县| 浑源县| 鄯善县| 双柏县|