Titlebook: Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology; Karim Dharamsi,Giuseppina D‘Oro,Stephen Leach Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Au

Meander

Collingwood and the Philosophy of History: The Metaphilosophical Dimension, of Collingwood’s ideas about the historicity of human experience and understanding. In conclusion, Ahlskog argues that the metaphilosophical dimension of Collingwood’s philosophy of history is integrally connected with the concept of history as self-knowledge.

indices

parallelism

災(zāi)禍

paroxysm

澄清

,The Development of Collingwood’s Metaphilosophical Views, philosophical analysis gradually gave rise to his mature metaphilosophical views. He shows that concerns with second-order questions concerning the nature of philosophy were present from the very beginning and that Collingwood’s later metaphilosophical view gradually evolve from, rather than break

符合規(guī)定

periodontitis

Presuppositions and the Logic of Question and Answer,oes indeed bear similarities to Bacon’s and Kant’s use of questions, as Collingwood claims. She argues that Collingwood’s emphasis on questions is more similar to Kant’s concern with presuppositions that make knowledge possible than to Bacon’s interest in pursuing and questioning nature to divulge h

繁榮地區(qū)

Collingwood, Pragmatism, and Philosophy of Science,church and that while there are family resemblances between Collingwood and philosophers of a pragmatist orientation, there are also some important differences. Collingwood tends to have in common with all pragmatists a rejection of the correspondence theory of truth. But unlike classical pragmatist

addict

,Why Epistemic Pluralism Does not Entail Relativism: Collingwood’s Hinge Epistemology,ained criticism in his . (2006). She argues that Collingwood’s metaphysics of absolute presuppositions aims to defend a form of epistemic pluralism which is not reducible to the kind of epistemic relativism Boghossian critiques. The decoupling of epistemic pluralism from epistemic relativism rests o