找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Collected Papers of Stig Kanger with Essays on his Life and Work; Ghita Holmstr?m-Hintikka,Sten Lindstr?m,Rysiek Sli Book 2001 Kluwer Acad

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: mandatory
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 15:04:32 | 只看該作者
Collected Papers of Stig Kanger with Essays on his Life and Work978-94-010-0500-5Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:39:02 | 只看該作者
Sheaves, Games, and Model Completionstockholm. My intention at that time was to present a technique of logical proof that would be easier to master than those usually encountered in textbooks on logic. Thus, the essay may be regarded as having a kind of pedagogical aim. It is hoped that this aim is not overshadowed by the technical character of my exposition.
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 23:06:02 | 只看該作者
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 04:45:27 | 只看該作者
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 11:09:51 | 只看該作者
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 13:09:42 | 只看該作者
Earth and Environmental Sciences Libraryn respect of a state of affairs. Rights can be of different types; for example, claim, power, or immunity. When a person X, for instance, has a claim to recover what he has lent to Y, this can be understood as X’s having a rights-relation of type claim to Y in respect of the state of affairs that X receives from Y what he has lent to Y.
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 17:46:50 | 只看該作者
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 22:59:16 | 只看該作者
0166-6991 ined significant results in proof theory as wellas the first fully worked out model-theoretic interpretation ofquantified modal logic. It is generally accepted nowadays that Kangerwas one of the originators of possible worlds semantics for modallogic. Kanger‘s most original achievements were in the
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 01:54:28 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4047-4of this type can be found in practically every textbook of elementary logic. Within each type there are several variants. It should also be pointed out that the three types are not strictly separated but allow of hybrid forms.
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 05:53:04 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88113-1by these three kinds of philosophers all belong to the wide domain of ethics, and they are easily confused. However, we shall try not to confuse them here, and for that purpose, we may put them under three distinct headings:
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 21:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
长乐市| 子洲县| 股票| 临邑县| 华亭县| 南昌市| 岑巩县| 奉化市| 龙陵县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 水富县| 增城市| 渝中区| 宜良县| 大洼县| 尚义县| 和林格尔县| 泽州县| 叶城县| 绵竹市| 阿合奇县| 盱眙县| 晋州市| 昌宁县| 张掖市| 贵定县| 文成县| 镇远县| 肇庆市| 泾源县| 耒阳市| 大庆市| 台北市| 当阳市| 柳河县| 乐至县| 邵阳县| 广平县| 澄江县| 黔东| 镇平县|