Titlebook: Collaboration and Resistance in Napoleonic Europe; State Formation in a Michael Rowe (Lecturer in Modern European History) Book 2003 Palgra

sesamoiditis

書目名稱Collaboration and Resistance in Napoleonic Europe影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Collaboration and Resistance in Napoleonic Europe影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Collaboration and Resistance in Napoleonic Europe網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Collaboration and Resistance in Napoleonic Europe網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Collaboration and Resistance in Napoleonic Europe被引頻次




書目名稱Collaboration and Resistance in Napoleonic Europe被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Collaboration and Resistance in Napoleonic Europe年度引用




書目名稱Collaboration and Resistance in Napoleonic Europe年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Collaboration and Resistance in Napoleonic Europe讀者反饋




書目名稱Collaboration and Resistance in Napoleonic Europe讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

共同給與

hysterectomy

State-formation and Resistance: The Army and Local Elites in Napoleonic France, — the ‘official’ elites within each locality — that discussion here will be concentrated. The mayor, as defined by the law of 17 February 1800 which laid down the new parameters of local government, was not expected to lie awake at night worrying about where his loyalties or his obligations lay. It

愛(ài)花花兒憤怒

,Centre and Periphery in Napoleonic Italy: The Nature of French Rule in the ,, 1800–1814,ntrinsic weakness of these states was apparent in the richness of their criminal jurisprudence, deprived of any real possibility of consistent application.. In stark contrast, the French state before and during the Revolution — even at its weakest — dealt with its periphery on its own terms.. Any It

BOLUS

,The Many Faces of Modernity: French Rule in Southern Italy, 1806–1815,ese two rather tired poles. Most probably opt for a hedging conclusion: the evidence of the exploitative intent behind Napoleon’s imperial enterprise is incontrovertible, yet none the less in both the . and the satellite states, Napoleonic government consolidated or began the process of administrati

interior

,Popular Mobilisation in Spain, 1808–1810: A Reassessment,in 1808, he found himself confronted by the resistance of the proverbial people numerous and armed, and, what is more, a people who threw themselves into battle with a ferocity and determination that has rarely been surpassed. To quote Gabriel Lovett: ‘All the energies of unoccupied Spain were direc

interior

,Centralisation versus Particularism in the ‘Third Germany’,y historical epoch, and therefore by no means unusual. What is unusual is the depth of feeling aroused by what was long exclusively seen as a period of foreign domination and national humiliation of ‘Germany’, which has made it all but impossible to arrive at a dispassionate assessment of the period

慢慢沖刷

Napoleonic Germany and State-formation,ted one set than Napoleon won another war and changed all the boundaries. They opted instead for maps with ‘natural’ frontiers: Napoleon could not redirect rivers or move mountains.. Faced with constant change, one looks for something underlying and enduring.

Comprise

Opportunity or Threat? Napoleon and the Hungarian Estates,r, a source of recruits and money, and its remoter parts served as a dumping ground for French prisoners of war.. The key political feature of this period for Hungary was the ongoing haggling between the Habsburg court and the representatives of the Magyar estates over the extraction of resources fo

泥土謙卑