Titlebook: Coleridge and the Nature of Imagination; Evolution, Engagemen David Ward Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers L

皺痕

The Rime of the Ancyent Marinere,‘I deem these legends terrible’ ., 1, 139, 90). Coleridge asserts the power of terror to achieve something not unlike Schiller’s aesthetic phase of human development, where Sami myth ‘unsensualizes the dark mind’:

Initial

冷漠

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72017-3as away and shortly after he returned there were critical developments in his personal life which opened windows to the puzzles of cognition and identity and raised further insistent questions about the nature of life. Amongst many other things, this changed the issues which demanded attention in the poem.

忘恩負(fù)義的人

Christabel,as away and shortly after he returned there were critical developments in his personal life which opened windows to the puzzles of cognition and identity and raised further insistent questions about the nature of life. Amongst many other things, this changed the issues which demanded attention in the poem.

BROW

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72017-3emerging from orality verbalization is thought of not just as the emission of a significant sound . something, but also as . or . in which poet and audience are mutually involved. Coleridge’s . wasn’t oral, but his habit of mind was. That was one of the reasons why the . was such an important concept for him.

反復(fù)拉緊

Kubla Khan,emerging from orality verbalization is thought of not just as the emission of a significant sound . something, but also as . or . in which poet and audience are mutually involved. Coleridge’s . wasn’t oral, but his habit of mind was. That was one of the reasons why the . was such an important concept for him.

gene-therapy

Infirm

史前

Introduction,ons, our conceptions of man’s being — the nature of his mind and his knowledge’.. If we are to try to do this, we should make use of the extraordinary developments in psychology, neuroscience, the study of human evolution and cognitive science that have taken place since Richards wrote. Readers who

MONY

,‘Something One and Indivisible’, universalize his notions, & yet each is variously finite. To . therefore is truly the work of the Inspired! This is the true . i.e. to reconcile the struggles of the infinitely various Finite with the .’ (., 2, 2208). From the viewpoint of one who demands logical clarity Coleridge’s arbitration