Titlebook: Coherence: Insights from Philosophy, Jurisprudence and Artificial Intelligence; Micha? Araszkiewicz,Jaromír ?avelka Book 2013 Springer Sci

endure

Book 2013egal reasoning should find it particularly helpful. By presenting such a broad scope of views and methods on approaching the issue of coherence we hope to promote the general interest in the topic as well as the academic research that centers around coherence and law.? .

fastness

1572-4395 nstraint satisfaction.Presents alternative stances to the cr.This book is a thorough treatise concerned with coherence and its significance in legal reasoning. The individual chapters present the topic from the general philosophical perspective, the perspective of legal-theory as well as the viewpoi

Optimum

Semisimpliziale algebraische Topologiel interpretation (and interpretation in general) and posit that such a framework forces one to take advantage of the criterion of coherence. Finally, I claim that interpretation only plays an auxiliary role in legal reasoning.

SEED

adduction

Tok Wang Ling,Mong Li Lee,Gillian Dobbiertant objections. This paper focuses on objections of a technical nature, related to the problems of representation of arguments and relations between arguments in the framework of CaCS. The paper outlines possible ways of dealing with these difficulties and indicates a perspective of further research on the subject.

Wordlist

Legal Interpretation and Coherence,l interpretation (and interpretation in general) and posit that such a framework forces one to take advantage of the criterion of coherence. Finally, I claim that interpretation only plays an auxiliary role in legal reasoning.

十字架

,Consistency and Coherence in the “Hypertext” of Law: A Textological Approach,i.e. monolog and dialog. Its characteristic resembles hypertexts rather than novels. Based on this, the distinction between consistency and coherence is presented and their roles are analysed. Finally, the relationship between intertextuality and coherence of the law is interpreted and explained.

合唱隊

Limits of Constraint Satisfaction Theory of Coherence as a Theory of (Legal) Reasoning,rtant objections. This paper focuses on objections of a technical nature, related to the problems of representation of arguments and relations between arguments in the framework of CaCS. The paper outlines possible ways of dealing with these difficulties and indicates a perspective of further research on the subject.

盟軍

Book 2013 general philosophical perspective, the perspective of legal-theory as well as the viewpoint of cognitive sciences and the research on artificial intelligence and law. As it has turned out the interchange of knowledge among these disciplines is very fruitful for each of them, providing mutual inspir

孵卵器

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69959-7o aims to show that, from a general epistemological point of view, constraint satisfaction is not the most attractive way to give content to the notion of coherence. In order to achieve these purposes, the paper distinguishes between epistemic, constructive and integrated coherentism. Epistemic cohe