Titlebook: Cohabitation and Non-Marital Births in England and Wales, 1600-2012; Rebecca Probert (Professor of Law) Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a di

Conformist

書目名稱Cohabitation and Non-Marital Births in England and Wales, 1600-2012影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Cohabitation and Non-Marital Births in England and Wales, 1600-2012影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Cohabitation and Non-Marital Births in England and Wales, 1600-2012網絡公開度




書目名稱Cohabitation and Non-Marital Births in England and Wales, 1600-2012網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Cohabitation and Non-Marital Births in England and Wales, 1600-2012被引頻次




書目名稱Cohabitation and Non-Marital Births in England and Wales, 1600-2012被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Cohabitation and Non-Marital Births in England and Wales, 1600-2012年度引用




書目名稱Cohabitation and Non-Marital Births in England and Wales, 1600-2012年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Cohabitation and Non-Marital Births in England and Wales, 1600-2012讀者反饋




書目名稱Cohabitation and Non-Marital Births in England and Wales, 1600-2012讀者反饋學科排名

蚊子

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2556-7irths.. But what was the position in the past? What proportion of births outside marriage occurred within cohabiting relationships in earlier centuries? And if the context of non-marital childbearing has changed, what might explain this?

Rotator-Cuff

Benzodiazepines

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2559-8ouples — in the sense of men and women who lived openly in a heterosexual relationship under one roof without having been united by a marriage ceremony, even if bigamous — were ‘vanishingly small’.. Setting aside some regional peculiarities — to be discussed later — the same applies at a somewhat ea

dandruff

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04621-1 need to establish the parameters of such a relationship. In order to address the phenomenon of a couple who were not married to each other while living together in a sexual relationship, historians have therefore applied their own terms. Rebecca Probert’s recent study defines cohabitation as ‘non-m

rheumatism

rheumatism

https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0089803ggesting that children’s legitimacy and the illicit sexual relationships that undermined it were issues of great concern both to authors and their readers. Typically, these fictional illegitimate characters, or those suspected of being illegitimate, are the offspring of the aristocracy or the landed

atopic

,Description des Mono?des de Type Fini,t.. Spurred on by three key drivers — extensive eighteenth- and nineteenth-century ‘public’ concerns about the looseness of marriage arrangements amongst the labouring ranks in rapidly growing and densely packed urban areas;. a mystifying inability on the part of demographic historians to link large

craven

https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0089803orphans, illegitimate children had usually lost at least one parent; unlike orphans, these children’s existence signalled illicit sexuality. Some illegitimate children were brought up by both parents; most, however, were not, and the nature of their upbringing provides important evidence about the e

侵略