Titlebook: Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care; Daniele Chiffi Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Auth

Herbaceous

書目名稱Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care被引頻次




書目名稱Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care年度引用




書目名稱Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care讀者反饋




書目名稱Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

誹謗

2192-6255 ods andresources from many different clinical but also non-clinical disciplines. In particular, this book shows how to leverage nursing knowledge and practice, which has been considerably neglected so far, to f978-3-030-59096-3978-3-030-59094-9Series ISSN 2192-6255 Series E-ISSN 2192-6263

Fantasy

Clinical Hypotheses in Diagnostic and Prognostic Reasoning diagnostic process is very unlikely to occur (though still possible), whereas this seems to be often the case for prognostic judgments. The reasons behind this distinction are based on the different types of uncertainty involved in diagnostic and prognostic judgments.

Venules

cajole

Nursing Knowledge and the Placebo Effecte for administering placebo in the clinical setting and have an essential role in promoting the placebo effect and reducing the nocebo effect. The beliefs responsible for the placebo effect are: (i) ., because they depend on the relationship between patients and health care professionals; (ii) ., be

催眠

Clinical Equipoise and Moral Leewayty transduction (UT) because the latter assumes the principle of indifference, which does not accommodate uncertainty in the right way. The same principle is then seen to distort also the received interpretations of CE.

催眠

Nonflammable

完成才會(huì)征服

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3211-6 diagnostic process is very unlikely to occur (though still possible), whereas this seems to be often the case for prognostic judgments. The reasons behind this distinction are based on the different types of uncertainty involved in diagnostic and prognostic judgments.

Glutinous

https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-0300-0ossibility showing their validity and limitations when applied to the concept of clinical possibility. Lastly, I conjecture that clinical possibility shows some features in common with normative modalities.