找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal; Proceedings of the F Hugo Tristram Engelhardt,Stuart F. Spicker,Bernard Conference proceedings 197

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: EVOKE
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 21:43:55 | 只看該作者
Comments on Pellegrino’s ‘Anatomy of Clinical Judgments’ctic, ethics, art and rhetoric” in the spirit of the Aristotelian division of the sciences, a division, in my view, almost wholly inappropriate, in the terms in which Aristotle made it, to any modern philosophical discussion of the nature of science or disciplines like clinical medicine that exist i
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:11:37 | 只看該作者
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 07:31:04 | 只看該作者
of interest to engage philosophers. By making the structure of medical reasoning more apparent to its users, philosophers can show health care practitioners how better to master clinical judgment and how better to focus it towards the goods and values medicine wishes to pursue. Becoming clearer about the pro978-94-009-9401-0978-94-009-9399-0
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:29:00 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612587rom an information-processing perspective, and second, by critically examining the research model that produced this finding My concern will be, then, with the psychological processes of clinical judgment and with ascertaining what research on clinical judgment has actually studied. The overall thru
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 16:17:15 | 只看該作者
Russia‘s Oil Barons and Metal Magnatesctic, ethics, art and rhetoric” in the spirit of the Aristotelian division of the sciences, a division, in my view, almost wholly inappropriate, in the terms in which Aristotle made it, to any modern philosophical discussion of the nature of science or disciplines like clinical medicine that exist i
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 17:49:37 | 只看該作者
framed in medicine and how choices of treatment are made. We hope it will afford the reader, whether layman, physician or philosopher, a useful perspective on the process of knowing what occurs in medicine; and that the results of the dis- cussions at the Fifth Symposium on Philosophy and Medicine w
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 01:24:22 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 02:12:35 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 07:49:52 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409300 by Eric Cassell in his ‘The Subjective in Clinical Judgment’ [1] are not philosophical in nature. Rather, they take the form of a general essay in psychology; and so my comments on Dr. Cassell’s discussion of them will be from one in the position of an outsider looking in.
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 11:13:33 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 16:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
神农架林区| 永清县| 即墨市| 垫江县| 运城市| 江津市| 盐山县| 延吉市| 江口县| 衢州市| 伽师县| 绥棱县| 莒南县| 萝北县| 尚志市| 漳浦县| 柘荣县| 连州市| 澄城县| 启东市| 海晏县| 乐山市| 青田县| 宝兴县| 翁牛特旗| 澜沧| 沙坪坝区| 石阡县| 丰镇市| 高淳县| 枣庄市| 荥经县| 宁海县| 莱芜市| 连城县| 犍为县| 虞城县| 厦门市| 威海市| 大田县| 体育|