Titlebook: Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization; Talking Tomorrow’s T Judith Kreuter Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The A

BULK

書目名稱Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization被引頻次




書目名稱Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization年度引用




書目名稱Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization讀者反饋




書目名稱Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization讀者反饋學科排名

IVORY

Judith KreuterExamines the implications of academic framing for political decision-making.Provides an account of how to operationalize insights from Science and Technology Studies in empirical political analysis.Co

本能

Springer Climatehttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/227597.jpg

exquisite

Rhetoric in British Politics and Societyscusses ‘wickedness’ in the sense of the non-existence of a clearly right solution, with regards to both challenges—anthropogenic climate change on the one hand and Climate Engineering as a potential measure to address this problem on the other. Kreuter explores the empirical case of the current aca

vasospasm

Rhetoric in British Politics and Societyree, so far only in the minds of people and the calculations for climate models. As well as outlining the ideas on which these approaches are based which date back decades, in some cases centuries, the chapter outlines the currently few political discussions of CE at the margins of climate policy. K

contradict

contradict

Erratum to: Rhetoric in Neoliberalism,mes voiced by academic actors coincided with the subsequent development and eventual use of the emerging technology. Kreuter highlights similarities as well as differences between the development of nuclear technology and the current discussion of CE approaches before identifying thematic security,

rheumatology

eucalyptus

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39850-1irical analysis of a sample of peer-reviewed academic journal articles from all disciplines. While framing is found to be rare across the sample, frames appearing in the sample are highly diverse. Furthermore, Kreuter highlights that many documents present a combination of counteracting frames which

ferment

Rhetorical Deductions in Sociological Texts, and subsequent decision-making in the current situation of little dedicated political discussion of these approaches. As well as discussing the high diversity of framing in the academic discussion of CE, Kreuter explores possibilities of extending the scope of attempts to understand future decision