Titlebook: Climate Change and Individual Responsibility; Agency, Moral Diseng Wouter Peeters,Andries Smet,Sigrid Sterckx Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan,

bankrupt

書目名稱Climate Change and Individual Responsibility影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Climate Change and Individual Responsibility影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Climate Change and Individual Responsibility網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Climate Change and Individual Responsibility網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Climate Change and Individual Responsibility被引頻次




書目名稱Climate Change and Individual Responsibility被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Climate Change and Individual Responsibility年度引用




書目名稱Climate Change and Individual Responsibility年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Climate Change and Individual Responsibility讀者反饋




書目名稱Climate Change and Individual Responsibility讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

即席

Climate Change, Human Rights and Moral Responsibility,posed by observed and projected climatic changes, climate change is conceptualized as a moral harm. We explore how the burdens involved in remedying the problem should be allocated, focusing on the principle of moral responsibility that plays a central role in common-sense morality. The responsibili

供過于求

一回合

Understanding the Motivational Gap,r moral framework to capture climate change as an important moral problem — remains incomplete, since individuals can effectively be identified as morally responsible for their luxury emissions. Second, the complexity of climate change and doubts about individual agency are overly emphasized, enabli

淘氣

Addressing the Motivational Gap and Tackling Moral Disengagement,luxury emissions, and to accordingly acknowledge their remedial responsibility for tackling climate change. First, emitters’ motivation can be increased by enhancing their moral judgement on the basis of common-sense morality, or by invoking alternative moral values. Second, the motivational force o

模仿

Conclusion,arding people’s rights and responsibilities does not imply that we are unable to make any judgement at all. On the basis of moral responsibility for their luxury emissions, emitters can at least be assigned remedial responsibility for climate change. The arguments usually invoked to support exonerat

模仿

AVOW

有害

Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2015

Injunction

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294776d, response to it is characterized by inaction at all levels. Hence, the severity of climate change and its consequences does not appear to sufficiently motivate people to tackle it. There are two complementary explanations for this motivational gap: first, our moral judgement system might be unable