Titlebook: Claude Lefort; Thinker of the Polit Martín Plot (teaches) Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013 Cla

Explosive

Francis A. Gunther,Jane Davies Gunthernd of the 1940s, the years 1950 and 1960 and the works such as his . (1972), . (1975), his essay on Solzhenitsyn’s ., or . (1978), his collection of writings on Merleau-Ponty, or, again, the texts composing . (1978), and then those which provided the material for other collections: . (1981), . (1986

背心

戰(zhàn)勝

Tara M. Smith,Glenn W. Stratton, and negotiated revolutions, terms all indicating distance from the revolutionary tradition they knew all too well. Even in South Africa in the 1990s, few spoke of revolution during what was indeed the radical transformation of the system of apartheid. The analysts, if they did not adopt the terms

overshadow

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5606-9 day, liberals (political or economic) have advocated the rights of man, to protect the individual from arbitrary government. They frame human rights as universal moral principles that, together with general rule of law principles, constitutionalism, the separation of powers, and so on, secure indiv

舔食

Michael R. Bleavins,Richard J. Aulerichdern form of despotism. Born in the antipaternalistic pursuit of freedom and equality, democratic society may end up giving itself up to a historically unprecedented type of paternalism — a sort of state maternalism. This is the “soft” and “mild” despotism Tocqueville struggles to envision as he loo

小說(shuō)

Residue Reviews/Rückstandsberichtet, had been adopted by the General Assembly the previous November without a vote, but 2008 was chosen in order to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the first International Conference on New or Restored Democracies held in Manila in June 1988. While general references to democracy have underpinned

肥料

muffler

defray

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5874-2cracy.” Beginning with .,. Lefort’s account of democracy was developed in subsequent work written both jointly and separately which elaborated the political logics of what Laclau and Mouffe were happy to affirm as “post-Marxism.” Laclau and Mouffe have not simply applied Lefort’s account of democrac

fulcrum