Titlebook: Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics; Jean Christianidis Book 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004 Aristotle.Histor

Scuttle

書目名稱Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics被引頻次




書目名稱Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics年度引用




書目名稱Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics讀者反饋




書目名稱Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

等級的上升

978-90-481-5850-8Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Ligneous

Jean ChristianidisConstitutes a "Reader book" of the history of Greek mathematics which is today rather timely in many respects

空氣

生存環(huán)境

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-48370-7k mathematicians have been passed down to us almost exclusively via the works of authors such as Autolycus, Archimedes, Euclid, Apollonius, Theodosius, Menelaus, Diophantus, and Pappus, the earliest of whom wrote in the second half of the 4th century BC. Additionally Aristotle’s philosophy of scienc

無法取消

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-48370-7bei also insbesondere an die . Wissenschaften, wobei exakt hier hei?en soll, da? gewisse Wissenschaften sich in ihrem methodischen Aufbau der Mathematik und der formalen Logik bedienen. In exemplarischer Form ist dies bei der Physik der Fall, und insofern diesen Aufbau begonnen zu haben, das Verdien

無法取消

無孔

NATAL

https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-28773-6questions dealing with existence has given rise to a familiar thesis about ancient geometry: that its constructions were intended to serve as proofs of the existence of the constructed figures. I propose here to examine that thesis, to argue its weakness as a . account of ancient geometry, and to of

河流

https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-28773-6metric algebra”. Chapter I of this paper is dedicated to an examination of the . of Apollonius. Though the central part of the “geometric algebra” is usually explained as a translation of the Babylonian algebraic techniques, it is not reasonable to attempt a determination of the nature of Book II by