Titlebook: Class, Gender and the Family Business; Kate Mulholland Book 2003 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2003 emoti

取之不竭

邪惡的你

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33301-2 considerable power, are unable to exercise that power. In examining these questions, the book places its central focus on the processes of private wealth-formation amongst wealthy families and questions the assumption that there is a simple correlation between male effort and dominance in the owner

牲畜欄

Definitionen und physiologische Grundlagenwith the introduction of bureaucracy, the formalisation of managerial structures and the specialisation of function. It will be suggested that it is at this point that the unequal character of the marriage business partnership magnifies the contradictions of the class gender nexus when attempts are

Expand

Systemerkankungen des Bewegungsapparatesis widely practised by the families studied, regardless of sector. Engels (1972) argues that this feature of female subordination is also manifest in the different class positions of the spouses, husbands being in the ruling class, while wives are more properly located within the working class. Whil

Facet-Joints

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62496-8ty of their wives. On the other hand, as this chapter reveals, such ordering is in itself prescriptive and appears to extend a permutation of capitalist logic to the household. Of course, such men’s absence from the household and their preference for disengagement from the messy arena of emotional w

left-ventricle

Epithelium

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00030-1riter, thinks that ethnicity is the primary driving force behind ethnic minority enterprise. Typically, this work also assumes that the utilisation of kinship relations as a business resource is unique to ethnic minority enterprise. The result is that the importance of the class identity of ethnic m

車床

Wahrscheinlichkeitsverteilungenmediated by the dynamics of the power relationship between men as husbands and women as wives and leads to women’s systematic exclusion. In this sense masculine ownership symbolises two sides of the same coin, with men on the one side and capital on the other, whereby the unity of married partners r

細(xì)胞學(xué)

打火石

Gender and the Management of Wealth Accumulation: ,with the introduction of bureaucracy, the formalisation of managerial structures and the specialisation of function. It will be suggested that it is at this point that the unequal character of the marriage business partnership magnifies the contradictions of the class gender nexus when attempts are