Titlebook: Class and Power in Sudan; The Dynamics of Suda Tim Niblock Book 1987 Tim Niblock 1987 dynamics.politics.Sudan

無力向前

書目名稱Class and Power in Sudan影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Class and Power in Sudan影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Class and Power in Sudan網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Class and Power in Sudan網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Class and Power in Sudan被引頻次




書目名稱Class and Power in Sudan被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Class and Power in Sudan年度引用




書目名稱Class and Power in Sudan年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Class and Power in Sudan讀者反饋




書目名稱Class and Power in Sudan讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Rodent

Social Forces under the Condominium,d shaped social forces within Sudan. This will lay the basis for describing the political dynamics of the nationalist movement as it developed in Sudan, and the political dynamics of post-independence Sudan. While the pattern of Sudanese politics may, in an immediate sense, have been determined by t

死亡

莎草

建筑師

,Politics and Economy under the Nimairi Regime, 1969–85,ior to that date. This is not to say that the ‘May revolution’ was a genuine revolution. The changes instituted in the country’s economic and social structure were, ultimately, insufficiently significant to justify using the term ‘revolution’. The political dynamics of the post-1969 state, however,

critic

Epilogue, and sugar which had just been announced, and the earlier 75 per cent rise in the price of petrol. After President Nimairi left Sudan on the following day for a medical check-up in the United States, the demonstrations spread. Many different elements of the population were drawn, largely spontaneous

critic

充滿裝飾

Kardiovaskul?r wirksame Medikamentetructure were, ultimately, insufficiently significant to justify using the term ‘revolution’. The political dynamics of the post-1969 state, however, were quite different from those of the pre-1969 state — not just in an institutional sense, but in the manner in which political authority related to the country’s social forces.

變異

解開

,Politics and Economy under the Nimairi Regime, 1969–85,tructure were, ultimately, insufficiently significant to justify using the term ‘revolution’. The political dynamics of the post-1969 state, however, were quite different from those of the pre-1969 state — not just in an institutional sense, but in the manner in which political authority related to the country’s social forces.