Titlebook: Church and State after the Dreyfus Affair; The Separation Issue Maurice Larkin Book 1974 Maurice Larkin 1974

輪流

認(rèn)為

Palate

Irascible

,The Dreyfus Affair — Before and After,nistry of Combes; and, despite his own personal hostility to Separation, his conduct of affairs was a major factor. Yet pressure came from many sides — from the Socialists for whom Separation was the threshold to social reform, from anticlericals who wanted it for its own sake, and from Combes’s ene

廣大

Cougar

The Separatist Minority,ill many historians who believe that Combes wanted the Separation. Combes himself sustained this interpretation in his memoirs, posthumously published in 1956;. and there is no doubt that in 1904 Combes made an outward show of favouring Separation, even to the point of putting forward a Separation b

謙虛的人

largesse

Le Festin de Pierre, but unshaken; and it now seemed to Combes that something more dramatic was needed. Hitherto Combes had used the threat of Separation sparingly and indirectly; he had merely intoned the familiar lament that Rome was making it hard for him to defend the Concordat in parliament. The summer of 1904, ho

Magnificent

GULLY

Some More Principles,lical, . solemnly ordered Catholics not to form these associations. The French Church was thereby stripped of the only embodiment that the State would recognise. This act of legal suicide not only obliged the Church to sacrifice nearly half a million francs’ worth of property (see p. 272, n.32); but