Titlebook: Chinese Marriage and Social Change; The Legal Abolition Max WL Wong Book 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020 Chinese Marriage and

我沒有辱罵

書目名稱Chinese Marriage and Social Change影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Chinese Marriage and Social Change影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chinese Marriage and Social Change網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Chinese Marriage and Social Change網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chinese Marriage and Social Change被引頻次




書目名稱Chinese Marriage and Social Change被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chinese Marriage and Social Change年度引用




書目名稱Chinese Marriage and Social Change年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chinese Marriage and Social Change讀者反饋




書目名稱Chinese Marriage and Social Change讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

muster

The Meaning of T’sip in Qing Lawsociety. The . was a source of law on the institution of concubinage in Hong Kong. Cases reported in . and ., local archives at Ba County and Tan Hsin from the Qing period, and some personal memoirs written by retired local Qing magistrates could all assist in understanding the interpretations of .—

GLUE

Judicial Construction of , in Chinese Family Law in East Asia: A Comparative Perspectivements from . in the Republic of China. The judges interpreted the legal status of concubine under the GQC with a view to expanding the rights of the concubine as much as possible, leading to differences in the understanding of the general principle of the institution of concubinage in different juri

Fretful

The Marriage Reform Ordinance 1971 and Its Aftermath. Following the draft McDouall/Heenan Report 1965, the Hong Kong Government published a White Paper in 1967 to solicit public opinions on marriage reform, paving the way to ending the recognition of Chinese customary and modern marriages and, most importantly, the abolition of concubinage. At the sa

arthrodesis

Conclusioncome illegal in the Republic of China in 1931 and the People’s Republic of China in 1950. The continued existence of this Chinese custom (and its reinterpretation in Hong Kong by colonial courts) had been regarded as an obstacle to modernity, so its final eradication was unavoidable. The judicial re

FEIGN

FEIGN

首創(chuàng)精神

LEERY

Book 2020fe, eliminating Chinese customs which had been previously recognised by the colonial legal system’s family law. This book contextualizes the Hong Kong situation by examining judicial cases interpreting Chinese customs and the Great Qing Code, offering a comprehensive understanding of the Hong Kong s

incision