Titlebook: China’s Urban Construction Land Development; The State, Market, a Tao Liu Book 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020 Formal and info

etiquette

fibula

meretricious

欺騙手段

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137401564f methodological practices are first presented. Three hypotheses are then made to facilitate the investigation of the research questions. Major concepts, including UCL and its formal and informal development, land use efficiency, land marketization, as well as regional milieu and their measurements,

BINGE

Re-Orientalism and Indian Writing in English of UCL, and the relationship between UCL utilization efficiency and its development model. The development of construction land in China has been closely associated with the unique urbanization model. Formal and informal land development contributed 60% and 40%, respectively, to the total growth of

Acumen

感染

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101289l state, the emerging urban land market, and the suburban peasantry. Municipal governments have played pivotal roles in this process. Under the political economy context of fiscal recentralization and responsibility decentralization, local states are faced with great pressure to continuously expand

Precursor

Whiteness and “the Imperial Turn”l governments under localized land market environments. Informal land development implemented spontaneously by peasants has displayed a landscape distinctive from that of its counterpart because of the intense inter-village competition, limited land resources for a certain village, absence of land p

RODE

閑逛

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101289ly been a localized practice, in which the local state-peasantry interaction has been rarely influenced by central land policies such as that in Beijing. In contrast, a range of groundbreaking local land institutions handling urban land marketization, “retained land” compensation, wholesale land nat