Titlebook: Children and the Afterlife of State Violence; Memories of Dictator Daniela Jara Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2

作嘔

Family Memory and the Intergenerational Remembering of Political Violence, as family legacies, and if so, what does this mean? What happens when political memories are remembered as family memories? This chapter suggests that family memories mobilize a sense of duty between generations, which may vary in its forms, ranging from sympathy to political commitment, but which nevertheless provides memory with ‘weight’.

CORD

When the Past Matters,ies of Chileans draws attention to the . of violence. By using this concept, it is argued that far from reaching closure after the transition, memories of past atrocities haunt the present and are remade and revisited by new generations. In this context, the relationship between family generations,

牢騷

The Culture of Fear and Its Afterlife, reflects on what an encounter with state violence meant for the children of Pinochet era and how it has left traces in the landscapes of intersubjective life until today. In this chapter, I show how the politics of fear promoted by Pinochet’s regime through state terror was accompanied by an increa

Synthesize

Political Stigmas and Family Legacies,nal discourses (e.g. religion, the military, and the executive power of the state) become entangled and woven together in everyday life, and how discursive ‘marks’ were transmitted within families whose legacies were inhabited by their children. It is in the inhabitation of legacies where the chapte

GILD

得體

抵制

OMIT

鈍劍

Political Personality Profilingatterns of mourning illuminate the specificity of the afterlife of violence in Chile, the transmission of political memory within the families, and its postmemory (specifically the circulation of mediated forms of remembrance within cultural memory).

鉆孔

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592483ry to that of the . or even to those stories told in the previous chapter, complicating the post-dictatorial reconstruction of the past. Together, they divest memory of any teleological sense, and open gaps and fissures in any attempt to construct representations of the past.