Titlebook: Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries; The Old-Word Traditi Johan Kerling Book 1979 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1979 Chaucer.

傻瓜

Pro Ajax and the .NET 2.0 Platform difficult to read: apart from explicit statements to that effect, there is also the indirect evidence for this in the appearance of marginal and interlinear glosses in Chaucerian MSS., and most convincingly in the publication of an edition of Chaucer with an extensive glossary.

jeopardize

CORE

Pro Ajax and the .NET 2.0 Platforme importance of Cockeram chiefly lies in his continuation of the Speght tradition, and in his transmission of a corpus of Speghtian words to later compilers, even though his own selection among these words is not of great interest and does not seem to have been a careful one.

arsenal

松軟

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0183-0 seventeenth century. Over 50% of the items in his long appendix of old words are based, directly and indirectly, on Speght’s glossaries. This appendix may be looked upon as the first Middle English dictionary, meant for the educated reader and the scholar, rather than for the general public. The im

過份

Pro Ajax and the .NET 2.0 Platformdebted to Coles’ . and therefore in a great many instances ultimately to Speght. The immediate effect of the expansion was that the alphabetical distribution of old words in this dictionary became more even than in the dictionary of which it was an abridgement.

GRAVE

癡呆

忍受

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0183-0ed as ‘Chaucerian’ (while many of his ‘old’ words were also from Chaucer) and by the fact that in later editions of his dictionary published during his lifetime (1662, 1671 and 1678) there is some inconsistency in the marking of old words.

終止

Edward Phillips:, (1658)ed as ‘Chaucerian’ (while many of his ‘old’ words were also from Chaucer) and by the fact that in later editions of his dictionary published during his lifetime (1662, 1671 and 1678) there is some inconsistency in the marking of old words.