Titlebook: Characterizing the Robustness of Science; After the Practice T Léna Soler,Emiliano Trizio,William Wimsatt Book 2012 Springer Science+Busine

harbinger

粗魯性質(zhì)

Understanding Scientific Practices: The Role of Robustness Notions,tion of, and intervention with phenomena relevant to the (dys-)functioning of materials and technological devices, by means of scientific understanding thereof. It is proposed that different kinds of robustness-notions enable and guide scientific research: (1) . is as a metaphysical belief that we h

專橫

The Robustness of Science and the Dance of Agency,dance of agency between scientists and the material world—nature, instruments, machines. The novel argument here is that in science such dances have the telos of extinguishing themselves—of making a clean split between human scientists and ‘free-standing machines’—of making the world dual. That this

Intentional

Dynamic Robustness and Design in Nature and Artifact,t of robustness. However, the idea may be so multifaceted that no single account will do. I shall canvass a few basic ideas of robustness, popular and technical, and then address such questions as: What is the relation of robustness to fragility or brittleness? Can a system be completely robust? Are

LIMIT

Characterizing the Robustness of Science978-94-007-2759-5Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942

倔強(qiáng)一點(diǎn)

空中

Platelet

978-94-007-9643-0Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

CAPE

食品室