Titlebook: Changing Social Risks and Social Policy Responses in the Nordic Welfare States; Ivan Harsl?f,Rickard Ulmestig Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan

成份

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90304-0ptations have tried to encourage people to enter into the risky position as self-employed. The chapter contextualizes these policy initiatives by discussing how promoting self-employment may also be regarded as a strategy for adapting labour markets to the need for flexibility imposed by the post-industrial economy.

冷淡周邊

剛毅

Leitidee Nachhaltige Entwicklungon of the population of the four major Nordic countries: Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. To provide a basis for comparison we include, where possible, data from countries approximating the liberal, the employment-centred and the sub-protective welfare models — the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy, respectively (cf. Gallie & Paugam 2000).

字謎游戲

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90558-7changes in and responses to increasing diversity in the family as well as the form of their response. The question driving this chapter is to what extent are the Nordic countries adapting to changes in lone-parent families.

Jargon

CAGE

COLON

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90304-0policies originating from the Nordic countries such as ‘flexicurity’ (Schmid & Sch?mann 1999), activation (Knijn 2012: 28), gender polices (Haas & Rostgaard 2011: 192), child investment through public provision of child care (Lister 2009) and so on.

分期付款

爭(zhēng)議的蘋果

閹割

Ethnification of New Social Risks: Programmes for Preparing Newly Arrived Immigrants for (Working) Statistics Denmark 2012; Statistics Sweden 2012). This challenge is not as demanding when it comes to labour migrants. as they tend to have high labour participation rates, while immigrants who come in search for protection are more vulnerable to labour market exclusion (see ?verbye 2010).