Titlebook: Central Problems in Social Theory; Action, structure an Anthony Giddens Textbook 1979Latest edition Anthony Giddens 1979 social science.soc

威風(fēng)

書目名稱Central Problems in Social Theory影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Central Problems in Social Theory影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Central Problems in Social Theory網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Central Problems in Social Theory網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Central Problems in Social Theory被引頻次




書目名稱Central Problems in Social Theory被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Central Problems in Social Theory年度引用




書目名稱Central Problems in Social Theory年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Central Problems in Social Theory讀者反饋




書目名稱Central Problems in Social Theory讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

車床

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82435-7accentuate the importance of the ‘system’, social and linguistic, as contrasted with the elements which compose it. But from then on the characteristic emphases diverge. In functionalism, the guiding model of ‘system’ is usually that of the organism, and functionalist authors have consistently looke

habile

J. Gardavsky,V. Daněk,J. Má?a,J. Plá?ek clearly distinguished from trends in non-Marxist social science, since most of the same divisions appear, even if in rather different form, within Marxism: the contrasts between the various sorts of ‘phenomenological Marxism’, ‘critical theory’, ‘Marxist structuralism’, etc. are often as pronounced

MARS

Introduction, Whatever differences might exist between these, they share certain common deficiencies deriving from the context of their formation; no one today, I think, can remain true to the spirit of Marx by remaining true to the letter of Marx.

PATRI

Structuralism and the Theory of the Subject,accentuate the importance of the ‘system’, social and linguistic, as contrasted with the elements which compose it. But from then on the characteristic emphases diverge. In functionalism, the guiding model of ‘system’ is usually that of the organism, and functionalist authors have consistently looke

異端

異端

http://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/223205.jpg

Madrigal

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82435-7ial sciences. Virtually all my work since that date has been concerned with developing that project. It seemed to me then, and still seems to me now, that social science in the contemporary world bears the strong imprint of ideas worked out in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in Europe.

繼承人

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82435-7Both terms have long since lost any precise meaning, but it is possible none the less to identify a number of core notions which each invokes. Functionalism and structuralism in some part share similar origins, and have important features in common. The lineage of both can be traced back to Durkheim

Firefly

J. Hogg,O. M. Nierstrasz,D. Tsichritzis analysis. The making of such a connection, I shall argue, demands the following: a theory of the human agent, or of the subject; an account of the conditions and consequences of action; and an interpretation of ‘structure’ as somehow embroiled in both those conditions and consequences..