Titlebook: Celebrity Authorship and Afterlives in English and American Literature; Gaston Franssen,Rick Honings Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicabl

休閑

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1786-2—in the critical reception of her work, in media images, and in other works of art. Walter Benjamin’s essay, ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’ (1936), is used to explore the proliferation of Stein’s artistic aura. Stein finds it ‘upsetting’ to arrive in Times Square to see an e

grounded

Oxidative Stress in Pathogenesis,. His reclusiveness, however, made him only more famous. His worldly withdrawal became an important trademark: it led to a constant stream of gossip and wild speculations about his life and work. After his death, Salinger’s literary stardom is undiminished and has even found its way into popular cul

極微小

Gourmet

el of modern literary culture, yet it continues to raise intriguing questions about the nature of authorship, writerly fame and the tension between authorial self-fashioning and public appropriation. This volume provides unique insights into the phenomenon..978-1-349-71888-7978-1-137-55868-8

Estrogen

the twentieth century.Represents a strong contribution to cThis book maps the history of literary celebrity from the early nineteenth century to the present, paying special attention to the authors’ crafting of their writerly self as well as the afterlife of their public image. Case studies are Joh

AROMA

先行

Krishnadas Nanath,Radhakrishna R. Pillai and admirers’ posthumous care for his image, negotiate a set of tensions central to his afterlife all along: tensions between publicity and intimacy, mediation and immediacy, and between the body and the book. The chapter asks what ‘friendship’ as a category of analysis adds to discussions of literary celebrity and ‘a(chǎn)fterlife’.

Between

最低點

充氣球

Krishnadas Nanath,Radhakrishna R. Pillaid the literature they read. This chapter investigates Melville’s response to the daguerreotype, and the method’s general appeal to the contemporary audience. It argues that the daguerreotype in Melville’s day prefigures the impact that photography would have on modern and contemporary celebrity culture.